But maybe now, finally, they are really listening to Rachel. I say finally, because what Rachel has been saying for some time now, has fallen on deaf ears.
And that's always been curious to me.
What is true, to quote Mr. Jackson, is “it’s time to retire our champion, and reward her with a less stressful life”.
Is it just me, or maybe Rachel should have been rewarded a year ago, after her amazingly successful, yet highly stressful, very ambitious and maybe borderline reckless, campaign? After all, Mr. Jackson, did she not reward you enough last year? Ok, maybe it made sense to give the Horse of the Year 4 months stall rest and try to bring her back as a 4 year old. But if you understood horse talk, you could hear her saying all year , “Maybe this isn’t working out like we all wanted it to... I’m just not really feelin’ it this year”
But at least now they’re really listening to Rachel. Finally.
It’s just curious to me.
Post a Comment